| BOLIVIA, 
  ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE AND SOCIAL ISSUES FROM THE 80S UP TO DATE  
 DOCUMENT PRESENTED FOR 
  THE TASK FORCE ON NATIONAL STRATEGIES FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT Presentation By: Jaime Aranibar, 
  Social and Economic Policy Analysis Unit (UDAPE),
 La Paz, Bolivia, March 2000
 
 Structural 
  Reforms  
   
    In the 1980īs Bolivia 
      suffered from major external shocks, including the rise in world interest 
      rates in the early 1980s, the cutoff in lending from the international 
      capital markets, and the decline in world prices of Bolivias commodity 
      exports. But the extent of economic collapse in the face of these shocks 
      suggests that internal factors as well as the external shocks have been 
      critical to Bolivias economic performance. The Bolivian hyperinflation 
      of 1984-85, running at the astounding rate of 24,000 percent per year, was 
      one of the most dramatic inflations in world history, is the only 20th 
      century hyperinflation that did not result from the dislocations of war 
      or revolution.The output grew by 1.7 percent, 
    the fiscal deficit was nearly 11% and the official international net reserves 
    could only buy two and half months of merchandise imports at the end of 1985.
 Bolivia has made a major 
    effort to maintain and develop its democracy, consolidate macroeconomic stability, 
    and carry out structural reforms designed to open up the economy and raise 
    economic growth and the well being of the population.
The structural reform 
    process began in 1985 with the implementation of the new economic policy, 
    which deregulated prices, interest rates, and the exchange rate, opened up 
    the economy, introduced fiscal discipline, allowed free movement of capital, 
    and pursued a monetary policy geared to price stability.
Major reforms included 
    streamlining the tax system by reducing the number of taxes, simplifying collection 
    procedures, and broadening the tax base and reforming the financial sector 
    with a view to increasing its efficiency and competitiveness. The Investment 
    Law, together with the Mining Code and laws on Oil and Gas, Exports, Property 
    and Popular Credit, Concessions, Bonds and Insurance, the "Heart" 
    Law that will allow a greater integration among countries of the region, as 
    well as laws on forestry, the environment, water use, and capitalization paved 
    the way for a substantial flow of domestic and foreign investment as well 
    as for privatization of public enterprises governed by the Sector Regulation 
    System. The recently passed Customs Law is designed to support a broad reform 
    of the customs department.
Social reforms were introduced 
    at the same time, notably the education, health and pension reforms, the basic 
    sanitation and social infrastructure programs, citizen participation, and 
    decentralization of government administration. Political and administrative 
    reforms were also implemented, which included the creation of the Constitutional 
    Court, the Magistrates' Council, and the Office of the Ombudsman. A Civil 
    Service Statute was adopted, aimed at improving the professional level of 
    the Civil Service and establishing rights for public sector employees. A reform 
    of the judicial system is under way, which will see the promulgation of new 
    codes for Criminal Procedure and Civil Law Procedure.
Implementation of structural 
    reforms has significantly altered the role of the main economic agents. The 
    private sector has acquired a predominant position in economic activity, while 
    the public sector is now focusing on its normative, supportive, and regulatory 
    functions, as well as on road building, basic sanitation, education, and health 
    as key ingredients in poverty reduction.The economic performance The reforms have boosted 
    economic performance. In 1998, output grew by over 4.7 percent attaining 
    the greater economic growth in South America, while domestic savings were 
    equivalent to 12.1 percent of GDP and private investment to 14.1 percent 
    of GDP. This performance was achieved thanks to higher levels of domestic 
    and foreign investment, increased exports, and a rapid growth in agro-industry, 
    mining, manufacturing, and services. The steadfast implementation of structural 
    reforms contributed to a surge in foreign direct investment, reflecting in 
    part the construction of the gas pipe line to Brazil and investments undertaken 
    by the entities transferred to the private sector under the capitalization 
    program.
Growth would have been 
    even higher if Bolivia had not had to face various natural disasters and a 
    significant deterioration in its terms of trade, estimated at 38 percent 
    for the decade.
Gross official international 
    reserves rose to the equivalent to nearly seven months of imports by year-end, 
    and a competitive exchange rate was maintained. However, preliminary indicators 
    of economic activity in 1999 signal growth of 1%, reflecting the effects of 
    the recent international crisis, in addition to inflation of 3% and a fiscal 
    deficit of 4.1%, due almost exclusively to the pensions reform. Regarding 
    the external sector, it is expected that the deficit in the current account 
    will represent 6.4% of GDP financed entirely with direct external investment. 
    These statistics reveal that the domestic economy continues to be highly vulnerable 
    to international economic shocks resulting from the high degree of dependence 
    on raw material exports from primary sectors (agriculture, mining and hydrocarbons).
Gross official international 
    reserves have risen steadily in resent years, from five and half months of 
    merchandise imports at end-1994 to seven and half months at end 1998. At end-1998, 
    gross official reserves were equivalent to about 95 percent of the domestic 
    and foreign short-term liabilities of the central bank.
Even though the improved 
    macroeconomic performance, a large part of the population still depends on 
    precarious jobs, bad health conditions, low levels of education, low levels 
    of labor productivity, in both urban and rural areas. This partly explains 
    why approximately 70 percent of the population are poor and 38 percent 
    live in extreme poverty. 
     
     NATIONAL 
      DIALOGUE 1997 
    To tackle this situation, 
      in October 1997 the Government convened a national dialogue to agree 
      on the objectives and state policies that would be pursued over its administration. 
      Representatives of the business community, the Church, labor and civil society 
      organizations, universities, NGOs and the government and opposition parties 
      took part in this event. Despite some shortcomings, this dialogue produced 
      various positive outcomes, principally an agreement to foster a program 
      to reduce poverty and boost economic growth. Those agreements led to the 
      Operational Plan of Action 1997-2002 (OPA) based on four pillars: opportunity, 
      equity, dignity, and institutional reform. 
     THE PILLARS OF THE 
    OPERATIVE PLAN OF ACTION 1997-2000 (OPA) The OPA reach a level 
    of growth to set the foundations for an effective reduction of poverty, through 
    a more egalitarian distribution of its benefits, by the following pillars: 
    Opportunity  Focuses on fostering 
    economic development and improving the distribution of income within a framework 
    of stability, increasing domestic savings, and improving economic infrastructure 
    in order to increase competitiveness. Equity   
    Entails focusing actions 
      on poverty reduction through policies and programs directed at education, 
      health, housing, the provision of basic services, and projects aimed at 
      raising productivity in rural areas.Institutional 
    reform  
     Seeks to generate 
      the conditions required for transparent relations between the government 
      and civil society in order to ensure that policies are sustainable. This 
      pillar also includes government efforts to modernize the State and fight 
      corruption.Dignity 
      
    Refers to the effort 
      to free Bolivia once and for all from the coca-cocaine circuit and the stigma 
      attached to it. Environmental 
    Policy  
    The objective of the 
      Bolivian environmental policy is to preserve the physical base of the natural 
      resources, and the environmental quality.  
    The actions forthcoming 
      from this objectives are designed within the framework of the improvement 
      of quality of living through a healthier environment, the fight against 
      poverty and improvement of the Human Development Index of the population, 
      the reduction of threats to human health and to the productivity of the 
      ecosystems, the respect to socio cultural elements of all the human groups 
      in our country and the combined use of instruments based on the market as 
      well as instruments of command and control.  
    The specific objectives 
      of environmental management in the area of Basins and Land are: the integral 
      and sustainable use of resources water and land; in Biologic Diversity the 
      integral, participative and sustainable use of the resources and the ecosystems 
      of the country; in Management of Environmental Quality, impact evaluation, 
      control and monitoring of environmental quality throughout the country; 
      finally, in Management of Forest Resources the specific objectives are the 
      implementation of the national forest regime and of the technical instruments 
      for the sustainable use of forest resources.  
    This objectives are 
      searched on a consensus of cross sector application of environmental variables, 
      citizen participation and decentralization. In the area of environmental 
      quality the Institutional Network of Environmental Quality is underway.   UDAPE and the 
      Sustainable Development Strategy 
    The Unit of Social and 
      Policy Analysis (UDAPE) due to its transversal and multi sector role, performs 
      and important labor of evaluation and monitoring of rules and policies designed 
      for the Strategy of Sustainable Development, as well as its expected impacts. 
      This is done through the evaluation of indicators and the participation 
      of its analysts specialized in social and economic areas. Citizens 
    Participation and Administrative Decentralization  
    The Citizens Participation 
      law and the law on Administrative Decentralization of the Executive Branch, 
      which have special provisions promoting citizens participation as 
      well as improvements in the distribution of income at the local level. The 
      Citizens Participation law transfers powers and resources to the municipalities 
      and grants legal status to all the regional organizations. The Administrative 
      Decentralization law also transfers and delegates technical and administrative 
      powers to the departmental Prefectures. 
    In the five years since 
      these two laws have been implemented, measured in terms of the objectives 
      set forth it has been possible to correct a large part of the skew which 
      was present in the allocation of public co-participation resources by distributing 
      on a per capita basis. Civil participation has also become much more significant 
      as approximately 14,000 Technical Organizations of Base (OTBs) and 311 Vigilance 
      Committees have been formed. 
    Several mayors have 
      been removed for discretionary handling of public funds which shows the 
      advances on social control mechanisms. With respect to resource allocation, 
      municipal investment in basic social services has increased in recent years. 
    Although this system 
      of decentralized public administration has achieved improvements in participation, 
      resource allocation, the provision of services and improved control of public 
      spending, it is necessary to step forward in this process in terms of equity, 
      municipal administration and the provision of basic social services. 
    Improving equity. 
      The horizontal equity needs to be complemented with a compensational allocation 
      of resources to regions characterized by high levels of poverty and low 
      population density. In that context, the co-financing policy becomes an 
      important factor through which the national government intends to introduce 
      equitable vertical distribution (allocation of funds based on regional needs) 
      in health, education, basic sanitation, and roads. To that end, a Unified 
      Fund Directory will establish how the Investment and Development Funds can 
      offer co-financing facilities in an orderly manner with the priority of 
      reducing poverty in the country. 
    Efficiency in the 
      provision of social services. In order to guarantee that supply meets 
      local demand, the processes of participatory planning will be strengthened 
      and implemented through Municipal Development Plans (PDMs), Annual Operative 
      Plans (POAs) and Municipal Institutional Development Plans (DIM) under the 
      responsibility of the Viceministry of Strategic Planning and Popular Participation. 
      These plans and their results will be subject to monitoring and evaluation 
      to increase the efficiency of their administration.   ACTIONS TO REDUCE POVERTY 
    The government prioritized 
      social spending and began implementing programs aimed at alleviating 
      poverty and improving the living conditions of the population. The share 
      of public investment outlays directed at poverty reduction rose from 18.5 percent 
      of all public investment in 1990 to 60 percent in 1999. This 
      was made possible by the transfer of productive activities from the State 
      to the private sector, thus freeing resources which could be redirected 
      principally to social sectors and transportation infrastructure. 
    Also, Bolivia is part 
      of the Debt Initiative for Heavily Indebted Countries (HIPC), whose 
      purpose is to provide a final reduction in foreign fiscal debt, to promote 
      growth and substantially reduce poverty, freeing resources initially programmed 
      for debt service and directing them towards social programs targeted to 
      the most vulnerable groups. For a country to be eligible, must have a good 
      performance on programs of structural reforms and adjustment supported by 
      the IMF and the WB, and a high level of external debt according to the debt 
      sustainability analysis. Also, the beneficiary must fulfill certain performance 
      criterion that include macroeconomic, social and structural reform progress 
      indicators. NATIONAL DIALOGUE 2000  
    The National Dialogue 
      of 1997 has enabled government policies to become State policies, generating 
      positive expectations in organizations involved in international cooperation 
      given that these organizations are working under a new scheme of social 
      conditionality for access to resources such the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries 
      (HIPC) initiative, and the Consultative Group. It is expected that his will 
      create a favorable international context for relaunching the National Dialogue 
      2000. 
    Based on this important 
      experience and with the aim of constructing a Strategy for the Reduction 
      of Poverty with full participation of the principal social and political 
      actors, including the political opposition, a National Dialogue 2000 will 
      be convened with the following objectives:  
       
        to transform initiatives 
          into State policies aimed at promoting growth and reducing poverty, 
          on the basis of agreements reached between the government, the opposition, 
          and civil society;  
        to strengthen civil 
          society trust in this instrument;  
        to prioritize the 
          use of resources for poverty reduction; and  
        to institute a participatory 
          body in charge of following up on and monitoring commitments made in 
          the course of the National Dialogue.  At the present time, 
    the participation of NGOs and private entrepreneurs has been assured and discussions 
    are underway to include the Church and political parties of the opposition. 
    International cooperation in conjunction with the public sector will prepare 
    financial funding for the principal programs of social development.Follow-up and monitoring 
    process   
    Follow-up and monitoring 
      of the structural reforms and the Strategy for the Reduction of Poverty 
      will take the form of tracking social and poverty indicators, as 
      well as others measuring the impact of programs and efficiency in the use 
      of resources. This information will be made available in the framework of 
      the next National Dialogue and international cooperation in order that the 
      political class, civil society, and foreign donors and creditors are fully 
      informed on progress being made and bring in their suggestions. 
    In order to attain those 
      objectives, the following activities are being studied:  
       
        nationwide, on-going 
          surveys will be conducted on the quality of life and specific surveys 
          will be performed to monitor poverty and its causes;  
        a regional information 
          system will be strengthened at the departmental and municipal levels; 
         
        in the social sector, 
          existing information systems in the Ministries of Education (SIE) and 
          Health (SNIS) will be strengthened, and a new information system will 
          be created in the Ministry of Housing;  
        an attempt will 
          be made to improve the information available in the Departments and 
          Municipalities regarding budgets, social expenditure, and social sector 
          indicators;  
        data on the national 
          budget, social expenditure and public investment, which are currently 
          kept by the Ministry of Finance, will also form part of the information 
          system, and  
        follow-up will continue 
          using indicators agreed upon at the Consultative Group.The institution responsible 
    for coordinating, revising, and disseminating the information will be the 
    National Institute of Statistics (INE). Analysis of social data and evaluation 
    of how well the strategy performs will be coordinated by the Social and Economic 
    Policy Analysis Unit (UDAPE), with the participation of INE and the economic 
    and social sector ministries. The results of the follow-up analysis will be 
    made widely available to civil society in order to encourage it to continue 
    participating in the operative phase of the poverty reduction strategy. |