Updated 5 March, 2004
 
 
NSSD Home

Resource Book
Key Documents
Reference Area
The Project
Documents
Country Area
Links
Tools
Search
About NSSD
 

 

OECD/DAC Donor Developing Country Dialogues on
National Strategies for Sustainable Development:

Parallel Learning Process in Namibia
Progress Report, September 2000

Prepared By Brian Jones,
Lead consultant

 


Introduction
Changes in project circumstances
Progress on chapter screening
Constraints to screening process

 

1. Introduction

The OECD/DAC initiative is providing financial support to Namibia to cover the following:

  1. Preparation of a paper (principal author: Brian Jones, the Namibian team leader on the DANCED Project) describing the process followed by the DANCED Project, and analysing how it has worked (successes and failures, what worked well or not, and the reasons).

  2. Assistance to the screening of the draft chapters to National Development Plan II, i.e. for about 17 chapters on social, industry and infrastructure/institutions clusters and related cross-cutting topics. The screening work will take place in July-August 2000 and will be carried out within the framework of the Danced Project’s approach to the screening of NDPII draft chapters.

  3. Preparation of a paper on the methods used for this screening analysis.

2. Changes in Project circumstances

The original time-table for the screening of NDPII chapters for environment and Sustainable Development issues was between mid-July and mid-August. This depended upon Line Ministries submitting their chapters during this period for review. However, many ministries were slow in submitting their chapters. At the time of submitting the August project progress report to IIED, the screening and review process had been rescheduled by the NPCS to take place between August 28 and September 26 or soon after. The process has continued to be dogged by delays however, and during September several factors led to the screening and review of chapters being scheduled to continue into the first two weeks of October. These factors were:

  • Ministries that still had not submitted their chapters for review

  • Ministries requesting rescheduling of the dates for screening their chapters

  • Ministry delegations not arriving on the scheduled date for their chapters to be reviewed

3. Progress on chapter screening

To date (02.10.2000) the following progress has been made:

NDP2 Chapter

Sub-consultant

Reviewed, returned to NPCS

Screening meeting attended

Comments

7. Population & Devt.

Prof. O. Arowolo

Consultant unable to attend

8.Labour and Employment

Prof. O. Arowolo

Consultant unable to attend

9.Human Resources Devt.

Prof. O. Arowolo

 

19. Trade & Industry

Ms. E. van der Linden

Chapter received too late to attend screening meeting – comments will still be incorporated

20. Mining

Dr H. Krugmann

 

21. Energy

Dr H. Krugmann

 

22. Financial Services

Ms E. van der Linden

 

23. Health & Sanitation Services

Prof. O. Arowolo

Consultant unable to attend

24.Education & Training

Prof O. Arowolo

Chapter not received from NPCS

25. Social Welfare & Community Devt.

Prof O. Arowolo

Consultant attended meeting, but ministry delegation failed to appear

27. Transport & Communication

Mr J. Korrubel

Consultant unable to attend

28. Regional and Local Government

Mr J. Korrubel

Consultant unable to attend

29. Housing and Construction

Mr J. Korrubel

Consultant unable to attend

36. Gender & Democracy

Ms J. Tarr

The chapter reviewed was replaced without the project being informed

4. Constraints to screening process

The same constraints reported in the August Progress Report remained in place during September. It has been difficult to co-ordinate the DANCED/DAC/OECD inputs with the NPCS because of these constraints. The slippage in the scheduling of screening meetings by more than a month has resulted in the unavailability of consultants at crucial times because they had other commitments. This was one of the causes of consultants being unavailable to attend screening meetings. Other causes of consultants missing screening meetings, were late notice of changes in the schedule and chapters not being received in time to be reviewed before the screening meeting. Some line ministries did not attend their scheduled screening meeting or requested changes to the schedule.

The screening meeting on the chapter on Gender and Democracy was not attended because the version reviewed by the sub-consultant was completely revised and replaced by a new version without the project being informed until the day of the screening meeting.

Progress on preparation of papers

    The paper describing and analysing the progress of the DANCED Project (including OECD-DAC support) has been finalised and submitted to IIED ready for presentation at the OECD-DAC mid-term review workshop on Donor-Developing Country Dialogues on National Strategies for Sustainable Development in Thailand from October 9-14.

    The paper describing the methodology for the screening process will be completed once it is clear when and how the screening process will be concluded.

Conclusion

The OECD/DAC support to the DANCED project’s screening of NDP2 chapters for environmental and sustainable development issues has made it possible to give much wider coverage to the screening process. Even though some chapters were reviewed without the consultant attending the screening meeting, and some chapters were reviewed after the screening meeting had taken place, opportunities still exist for comments to be incorporated into chapters. The NPCS has given assurances that comments from the DANCED/OECD-DAC reviewers will be incorporated into chapters when they are revised following a series of national consultations on NDP2. Despite the constraints encountered, the OECD-DAC support will still have had a significant impact once the screening process and final revisions of chapters have been completed.

 

 


 


© NSSD 2003  
NSSD.net Home
Top of Page