1.
Introduction
The OECD/DAC initiative
is providing financial support to Namibia to cover the following:
-
Preparation of
a paper (principal author: Brian Jones, the Namibian team leader on
the DANCED Project) describing the process followed by the DANCED
Project, and analysing how it has worked (successes and failures,
what worked well or not, and the reasons).
-
Assistance to
the screening of the draft chapters to National Development Plan II,
i.e. for about 17 chapters on social, industry and infrastructure/institutions
clusters and related cross-cutting topics. The screening work will
take place in July-August 2000 and will be carried out within the
framework of the Danced Projects approach to the screening of
NDPII draft chapters.
-
Preparation of
a paper on the methods used for this screening analysis.
2.
Changes in Project circumstances
The original time-table
for the screening of NDPII chapters for environment and Sustainable Development
issues was between mid-July and mid-August. This depended upon Line Ministries
submitting their chapters during this period for review. However, many
ministries were slow in submitting their chapters. At the time of submitting
the August project progress report to IIED, the screening and review process
had been rescheduled by the NPCS to take place between August 28 and September
26 or soon after. The process has continued to be dogged by delays however,
and during September several factors led to the screening and review of
chapters being scheduled to continue into the first two weeks of October.
These factors were:
-
Ministries that
still had not submitted their chapters for review
-
Ministries requesting
rescheduling of the dates for screening their chapters
-
Ministry delegations
not arriving on the scheduled date for their chapters to be reviewed
3. Progress
on chapter screening
To date (02.10.2000)
the following progress has been made:
NDP2 Chapter
|
Sub-consultant
|
Reviewed,
returned to NPCS
|
Screening
meeting attended
|
Comments
|
7. Population
& Devt.
|
Prof. O. Arowolo
|
|
|
Consultant unable
to attend
|
8.Labour and
Employment
|
Prof. O. Arowolo
|
|
|
Consultant unable
to attend
|
9.Human Resources
Devt.
|
Prof. O. Arowolo
|
|
|
|
19. Trade &
Industry
|
Ms. E. van der
Linden
|
|
|
Chapter received
too late to attend screening meeting comments will still
be incorporated
|
20. Mining
|
Dr H. Krugmann
|
|
|
|
21. Energy
|
Dr H. Krugmann
|
|
|
|
22. Financial
Services
|
Ms E. van der
Linden
|
|
|
|
23. Health &
Sanitation Services
|
Prof. O. Arowolo
|
|
|
Consultant unable
to attend
|
24.Education
& Training
|
Prof O. Arowolo
|
|
|
Chapter not
received from NPCS
|
25. Social Welfare
& Community Devt.
|
Prof O. Arowolo
|
|
|
Consultant attended
meeting, but ministry delegation failed to appear
|
27. Transport
& Communication
|
Mr J. Korrubel
|
|
|
Consultant unable
to attend
|
28. Regional
and Local Government
|
Mr J. Korrubel
|
|
|
Consultant unable
to attend
|
29. Housing
and Construction
|
Mr J. Korrubel
|
|
|
Consultant unable
to attend
|
36. Gender &
Democracy
|
Ms J. Tarr
|
|
|
The chapter
reviewed was replaced without the project being informed
|
4. Constraints
to screening process
The same constraints
reported in the August Progress Report remained in place during September.
It has been difficult to co-ordinate the DANCED/DAC/OECD inputs with the
NPCS because of these constraints. The slippage in the scheduling of screening
meetings by more than a month has resulted in the unavailability of consultants
at crucial times because they had other commitments. This was one of the
causes of consultants being unavailable to attend screening meetings.
Other causes of consultants missing screening meetings, were late notice
of changes in the schedule and chapters not being received in time to
be reviewed before the screening meeting. Some line ministries did not
attend their scheduled screening meeting or requested changes to the schedule.
The screening meeting
on the chapter on Gender and Democracy was not attended because the version
reviewed by the sub-consultant was completely revised and replaced by
a new version without the project being informed until the day of the
screening meeting.
Progress on preparation
of papers
The paper describing
and analysing the progress of the DANCED Project (including OECD-DAC
support) has been finalised and submitted to IIED ready for presentation
at the OECD-DAC mid-term review workshop on Donor-Developing Country
Dialogues on National Strategies for Sustainable Development in Thailand
from October 9-14.
The paper describing
the methodology for the screening process will be completed once it
is clear when and how the screening process will be concluded.
Conclusion
The
OECD/DAC support to the DANCED projects screening of NDP2 chapters
for environmental and sustainable development issues has made it possible
to give much wider coverage to the screening process. Even though some
chapters were reviewed without the consultant attending the screening
meeting, and some chapters were reviewed after the screening meeting
had taken place, opportunities still exist for comments to be incorporated
into chapters. The NPCS has given assurances that comments from the
DANCED/OECD-DAC reviewers will be incorporated into chapters when they
are revised following a series of national consultations on NDP2. Despite
the constraints encountered, the OECD-DAC support will still have had
a significant impact once the screening process and final revisions
of chapters have been completed.
|