National Strategies for Sustainable Development (nssds):
Vital development tool or another empty acronym?
Presentations
The NSSD Workshop:
An Introdction
Francis Sullivan:
WWF - UK
Welcome on behalf of DEG; a brief
introduction and a few thoughts:-
·Why
are we here: Are NSSDs an empty acronym? If yes then we can leave today
and forget about them, if no then, each of us and our organisations need decide
how our organisation might assist the implementation of this – the forgotten
third component international development target.
·Today
is a learning exercise for us all. Bretton Woods, RSPB, Tearfund and WWF
as part of the UK NGO – Development and Environment Group have convened today
to explore NSSD and promote further debate. – 1st step.
·Notions
of what is Sustainable Development has moved along way since Bruntland and from
reports like; Caring for the Earth, World Conservation Strategy. Most
of us here today believe that the environment is fundamental to poverty elimination
and that environment is a development opportunity. As Caring for the Earth
states: “we need not lose....We can eliminate the risk by ensuring that the
benefits of development are distributed equitably, and by learning to care for
the Earth and live sustainably”.
Format
of Today
·1st
Session: Paula Chalinder, Co-leader of DAC Task Force and DFID’s Environment
Advisor - Sustainable Development Unit will outline DFID's experiences to-date
on NSSDs and the DFID/EU pilot project currently underway.
·Next
Sarah Cambridge from the World Bank UK and Ireland will talk about World Bank
Initiatives the Comprehensive Development Frameworks (CDF) and Poverty Reduction
Strategy Papers (PRSPs) needed for debt relief and how they relate to NSSDs.
·And
then Mary Painter, RSPB, and Co-Chair of the DEG, will provide a summary of
Civil Society experiences in National Strategy Dialogues and lessons that can
be picked up for NSSDs processes.
·There
will be an opportunity at the end of this session to ask questions and identify
issues for further discussions in the 2nd session.
·2nd
Session: Break out-groups with both pre-set questions plus some of those arising
out of the 1st Session: You might want to think about these questions
during the presentations? These are provided in your packs.
·3rd
Session: Present back discussions and capture experiences. What might
the next steps be?
Three Main
Issues for Today
·Are
NSSDs the process for mainstreaming the environment?
The DAC views NSSD
“as the main vehicle for integrating poor economic growth with social improvement
and responsible approach to environmental management”. It sounds good,
but what does this really mean in practice? Are NSSD a practical tool
for mainstreaming the environment? The process for the 2nd
Development Plan in Namibia is looking at ways to join the 1st Development
Plan with the Green Plan...but how will this be implemented in practice....
what political, bureaucratic and private interests need to be overcome to ensure
it is not business as usual but with another name!
·Strategy
overload?
Developing
countries have been asked to develop numerous national strategies over the years.
Currently, in for example Bolivia, they are involved in the World Bank’s Comprehensive
Development Framework; Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers and NSSD dialogue.
How do these strategic processes over-lap? What weight are they given
and how will they be resourced? What does this mean for the Bolivian Government,
Civil Society and even Business?
·Civil
Society engagement in National Strategy Dialogues – linking local with national
How
can Civil Society engage in NSSDs? How do Civil Society organisations
input into National Strategic planing processes? Can local organisations
/community based organisations realistically input? Do they have the capacity?
What processes best ensure equitable distribution of environment benefits.
How can national interests not be borne by the poor? There are plenty
of experiences out there....how can we learn lessons?
Outputs of
Today
·Today
is not about developing grand plans around this International Development Target
(IDT). We want to learn from each other today, to hear from people involved
in the National Strategic Processes. If we decide that NSSDs are a vital
development tool and the this IDT is to be achieved, we should look to come
away from today with practical outputs that is the stepping stone to move this
forward....rather than rhetoric and empty promises, I would suggest three outputs
might be:
·How
can UK NGOs support partners to engage in NSSD processes?
·What
must be done now for Earth Summit2002?
·If
we are (as DFID pledges) to achieve the OECD DAC International Development
Target by 2015 along with the other targets then we need practical actions and
investment of resources and synergy between all actors to make this happen –
How?
|