Updated 5 March, 2004
 
 
NSSD Home

Resource Book
Key Documents
Reference Area
The Project
Documents
Country Area
Links
Tools
Search
About NSSD
 


OECD/DAC Dialogues with Developing Countries on
National Strategies for Sustainable Development

Status Review of
National Strategies for Sustainable Development
in Ghana

June 2001

Contents

<< Previous

Next >>


3. National strategies for sustainable development in Ghana

Given the large number of strategy processes and programming approaches to implementing Vision 2020 in effect and the time constraints of the study, the review would only briefly describe some of the key historical and current strategic frameworks.

3.1 Key historical processes

3.1.1 7-Year Development Plan

The 7-Year Development Plan was initiated in 1964 as first integrated and comprehensive economic plan in Ghana’s development administration history. The main objectives were to accelerate economic growth, start a socialist transformation of the economy and remove all vestiges of colonial structure of the economy. It was prepared by the Planning Commission with input from committees of civil service, academia and business. Key stakeholders were the Conventions Peoples Party (CPP) and government, the state sector of the economy, cooperatives, civil service, the intelligentsia, private business sector. Implementation of the plan was cut short by the military intervention of 1966.

3.1.2 The Economic Recovery Programme

The next most significant historical programmatic effort in national development was the two-phased Economic Recovery Program involving stabilization and rehabilitation, and liberalization and growth that was initiated in 1983 with the support of the World Bank and the IMF. The major objectives were to arrest the severe economic decline of the 1970s and improve the social and overall well being of Ghanaians, particularly the under-privileged, deprived and vulnerable. The programme was prepared solely by government teams and collaborating officials of the World Bank and the IMF, with very little or no involvement of civil society groups. The ERP provided the impetus for a long-term growth approach to development that laid the basis for the development of the National Development Planning Framework that was the pre-cursor to the Ghana Vision 2020.

These historical strategic processes are more fully described in Annex B.

3.2 Contemporary mechanisms

3.2.1 Ghana Vision-2020

I. Year initiated: The underlying long-term development policy framework preparation was initiated in 1991 and completed in 1994 but the Ghana Vision-2020 nomenclature was adopted in 1996.

II. Brief description: A national development policy framework covering long-term (25 years) development objectives covering five basic thematic areas of macroeocnomics, human development, rural development, urban development and enabling environment. The achievement of these long-term objectives is expected to transform Ghana into a nation whose material well being and standard of living would conform to those of middle-income countries as at 1993/94. The Ghana Vision-2020 provided a framework to guide sectoral agencies and the District Assemblies prepare policies and programmes for economic and social development that would enable Ghana achieve her long-term goals. The long-term objectives were to be achieved by implementing policies through five-year medium-term rolling plans.

III. Key Objective: Ghana is to achieve a balanced economy and a middle-income country status and living standard by the year 2020.

IV. Status of preparation and implementation: Preparation of the Vision has been completed. The First Medium Term Development Plan 1996-2000 has been implemented. The preparation of the Second Medium Term Development Plan 2001-2005 has been halted by the new government after the Policy Framework had been developed.

V. Key stakeholders: The preparation of the Vision was dominated by central government agencies, especially the National Development Planning Commission and ministries, departments and agencies. However, the preparation of the medium term development plans has involved a very wide array of stakeholders, including District Assemblies, the private sector, NGOs, academics, workers, and traditional authorities.

VI. Main preparation process: The preparation of the Vision was principally the work of the National Development Planning Commission. The NDPC first sought to inject social and spatial considerations in to the economic policy framework underlying the structural adjustment programme in 1987. This effort was followed by the production of a human centered development policy framework in 1991 by the Commission. To integrate long-term perspectives into the ERP that would ensure that Ghana achieves continuous development at an accelerating pace through the promotion of a human-centered, comprehensive and integrated approach to development, the National Development Policy Framework (NDPF) was drafted by the NDPC during 1991-1994. Sectoral ministries and agencies, and, district authorities provided comments on goals and hierarchy of goals and strategies of the NDPF.

VII. Key documents:

National Development Planning Commission. Making People Matter – A Human Development Strategy for Ghana. Publication by NDPC (IDPG\SPD). December 1, 1991.
Republic of Ghana, National Development Policy Framework. Volume I: Long Term Development Objectives. National Development Planning Commission. February 1994.
Republic of Ghana, National Development Policy Framework. Volume I: Long Term Development Objectives. National Development Planning Commission. Revised May 1994.
Republic of Ghana, Ghana-Vision 2020 (First Step: 1996-2000), Presidential Report to Parliament on Coordinated Programme of Economic and Social Development Policies. December 1994.

VIII. Observations on outcomes and effectiveness: The Vision has provided a guiding and overarching reference point for the formulation and implementation of various development strategies and programmes since 1996. However, implementation of the First Medium Term Plan (1996-2000) has lagged while the core strategic underpinnings of the Vision are yet to be integrated into the development psyche of the nation as the people are not generally familiar with what it would take to achieve the Vision.

3.2.2 National Economic Forum

I. Year initiated: September 1997

II. Brief description: It was the first national consensus building exercise for all stakeholders to discuss economic and development policy measures for growth under the Ghana –Vision 2020. It was attended by the President, Vice-President, Ministers and various other stakeholders, and was supported by the UNDP.

III. Key Objectives: The fundamental objective of the National Economic Forum was achieving a national consensus on policy measures for accelerated growth, within the framework of Ghana-Vision 2020.

IV. Status of preparation and implementation: The outcomes and consensus reached have been integrated into national economic and development policy making.

V. Key stakeholders: It was attended by the following numbers of participants, keyed to the Syndicate Groups they represented:

  • Macroeconomic stability 142
  • Economic Growth: Agriculture 83
  • Economic Growth: Manufacturing 92
  • Employment and Human Development 99

The Post-Forum Committee to prepare Action Plans and integrate recommendations had 52 members.

Overall, participation in the Forum was by several interest groups including:

1) government,

2) Council of State,

3) parliament,

4) judiciary,

5) private sector,

6) labour,

7) NGOs,

8) political parties,

9) traditional authorities,

10) donors,

11) professional groups (such as the Ghana Bar Association, Ghana Medical Association),

12) farmers,

13) the military,

14) universities,

15) local authorities,

16) the CSIR,

17) consumers association of Ghana,

18) constitutional bodies (such as the National Commission on Civic Education, CHRAJ),

19) private press

VI. Main preparation process: The NDPC invited several stakeholders, grouped into four syndicate groups to discuss issues of macroeconomic stability, agriculture, manufacturing and international competitiveness, and, employment aimed at generating strategic policy recommendations for reducing inflation and unemployment. A Post-Forum Committee synthesized and harmonized the four Syndicate Group Reports into a comprehensive Forum Report and a set of Action Plans

VII.Linkages to Ghana-Vision 2020: The Forum was a mechanism for helping review and affirm economic and development policy measures required for accelerated growth as envisaged under the Ghana Vision 2020.

VIII.Key documents: Republic of Ghana – National Economic Forum at Accra International Conference Centre on 2-3 September 1997 on the Theme: Achieving National Consensus on Policy Measures for Accelerated Growth within the Framework of Ghana-Vision 2020.

IX. Observations on outcomes and effectiveness: The Forum provided the opportunity for various stakeholders to reach consensus on key economic issues and actions needed to underpin the achievement of the goals of the Ghana Vision 2020. The Forum was well attended and the reports were well received by government. However, implementation of several recommendations has lagged. The new government would likely utilize the mechanism of the Forum

3.2.3 Comprehensive Development Framework

I. Year initiated: 1999

II. Brief description: A development programming approach that takes a comprehensive view of the entire development spectrum and provides a holistic framework for identifying and analyzing development needs, and programming development interventions from all partners in an integrated and consistent manner designed to strengthen development planning and coordination across all the development partners.

III. Key Objectives: The objectives of the CDF process were to engender:

  • improved inter-relationships, coherence and increased integration of sector polices and programmes
  • a rapid shift by donors towards financing of development programmes, instead of individual projects
  • reduced government effort and resources in managing different donor systems
  • increased government ownership and management of Ghana’s development programme, and stronger partnership with donors, civil society and the private sector.
  • a more comprehensive pattern of resource allocation that reduces inter-donor competition.

IV. Status of preparation and implementation: Preparation of the CDF was completed in 1999 for the Tenth Consultative Group meeting in Accra in November 1999.

V. Key stakeholders: Government of Ghana, civil society represented by NGOs and other stakeholders under the ambit of SAPRI, and donors

VI. Main preparation process: This is discussed in Section 4.

VII. Linkages to Ghana-Vision 2020: The CDF provides the framework for development assistance required to achieve poverty reduction as envisaged under Ghana-Vision 2020. The formulation of thematic areas covered by the CDF are framed differently but in essence cover the same ground as addressed by the eight thematic areas of the Second Step of the Ghana-Vision 2020. However, the CDF serves more as a more immediate development programming tool while Ghana-Vision 2020 provides a more long-term vision of national growth.

VIII. Key documents: Government of Ghana- A First Draft Comprehensive Development Framework Towards Ghana Vision 2020. Tenth Consultative Group (CG) Meeting. November 23-21, 1999. Accra. Ministry of Finance.

IX. Observations on outcomes and effectiveness: The CDF has yielded favourable outcomes in terms of helping to better focus and redefine donor, especially World Bank, development assistance to Ghana. The document provided the framework for the World Bank’s new Country Assistance Strategy for Ghana. The involvement of civil society in the preparation of the document has enhanced their role in development programming.

3.2.4 Ghana Poverty Reduction Strategy (GPRS)

I. Year initiated: Developed in 1995/96, being updated in 2000-2001

II. Brief description: A home-grown strategic approach to poverty reduction through emphasis on economic growth, integrated rural development, improved access of the poor to basic economic and social services, expanded employment for urban poor, and, family planning.

III. Key Objectives: The overarching goal is reduction of poverty and general improvement in the welfare of all Ghanaians. The objectives of the GPRS include: (a) reducing the incidence and depth of both rural and urban poverty, mainly through the acceleration of pro-poor growth, (b) improving the income earning capabilities and opportunities for the poor and vulnerable, (c) minimizing gender and geographical disparities, (d) facilitating a healthier, better educated and more productive population.

IV. Status of preparation and implementation: The development of the GPRS was completed and has generated projectized interventions. A revision and update of the Ghana Poverty Reduction Strategy process is under preparation. The preparation of the GPRS is parallel to the preparation of the World Bank-sponsored Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSP)

V. Key stakeholders: The update of the GPRS involves participation from several stakeholder groups, including the NDPC, sectoral ministries and agencies, local authorities, civil society organizations, professional bodies, academic think tanks, and trades unions.

VI. Main preparation process: The government, with the support of the UNDP, produced a National Action Programme for Poverty Reduction in 1995. This engendered the need for an institutional mechanism to coordinate development of initiatives, resulting in the formation of an Inter-Ministerial Committee served by an inter-agency and multi-sectoral Technical Committee on Poverty (TCOP) that produced the Policy Focus for Poverty Reduction in 1996. Under the ambit of the NDPC’s Poverty Reduction Unit, a Ghana PRS Task Force (now composed of the TCOP members) is coordinating the process of updating the GPRS through the use of Core Teams to prepare frameworks and programmes covering focus areas of the strategy.

VII. Linkages to Ghana-Vision 2020: The overall poverty reduction process of the Government is derived from and tied to the Ghana- Vision 2020. The objectives of the 1995 poverty reduction strategy informed the goals and approach adopted for poverty alleviation in the Vision 2020. The update of the GPRS and the preparation of the Ghana Vision 2020 - Second Step framework are linked in several ways:

(a) the six priority areas of the GPRS are covered by the Vision 2020 framework explicitly,

(b) the GPRS is linked to the existing planning process with the GPRS deriving its focus from the Vision 2020 Second Step policy framework,

(c) the timetables for the two processes were synchronized,

(d) the outputs of the Second Step process would be factored into the GPRS update,

(e) planning guidelines for use by District Assemblies and sectoral agencies would reflect the focus on poverty reduction as emerging from both the Vision 2020 and the updated GPRS.

VIII. Key documents:

Republic of Ghana, Reducing Poverty through Improved Agriculture. Main Report Prepared by the Government of Ghana for the Tenth Meeting of the Consultative Group for Ghana. Accra November 23-24, 1999.
The World Bank, Republic of Ghana – Development Strategy for Poverty Reduction. Report No. 20186-GH. March 8, 2000.
Republic of Ghana, Policy Focus for Poverty Reduction. Technical Committee on Poverty (TCOP), Technical Secretariat, NDPC. Accra. September 1996.
World Bank, Ghana – Poverty Past, Present and Future. Report No. 14504-GH. Population and Human Resources Division, Africa Region. June 29, 1995.
Government of Ghana, National Action Programme for Poverty Reduction. Ministry of local Government and Rural Development, with assistance of UNDP. February 1995.

IX. Observations on outcomes and effectiveness: The GPRS has spawned three major interventions: (a) the National Poverty Reduction Programme with support from the UNDP, (b) The Social Investment Fund aimed at enhancing access of the poor to basic services and local-level capacity-strengthening with support from the UNDP, African Development Bank, (c) Community-based Poverty Reduction Approaches initiative. Effectiveness of these projectized interventions is hampered by several factors including lack of micro-credit and implementation capacity weaknesses at the local level. Other initiatives that have taken on board the poverty reduction objective include the Village Infrastructure Project (VIP) and the Agricultural Services Sector Investment Programme (AgSSIP).

3.2.5 Common Country Assessment (CCA)

II. Year initiated: 1997

III. Brief description: A participatory process for reviewing and analyzing progress in national development goals and programmes and as foundation for programming and advocating development assistance under the UN system. Under the United Nations Development Assistance Framework (UNDAF), the UN Mission has since 1997 undertaken the Common Country Assessment (CCA) of the national development situation to provide standard reference for the government and UN system organizations in terms of the status human development, analysis of progress and problems in meeting common development targets, and, basis for development programming.

IX. Key Objectives:

  • Provide an integrated and cross-sectoral assessment of the status, problems and challenges in achieving human development goals.
  • Provide an instrument for programming and advocacy of development assistance from the UN system in-country through the UNDAF mechanism.
  • Provide common framework for monitoring the efficacy of UN development assistance
  • Provide a tool for improving development planning and coordination between the government, development partners, civil society and the private sector.

V. Status of preparation and implementation: The first CCA was prepared in 1997 and used as an input into the preparation of Ghana’s first UNDAF for the period 1998-2000. The 1999 CCA formed the basis for the formulation of Ghana’s UNDAF 2001-2005 which prescribes the country programmes of the UN agencies.

VI. Key stakeholders: The Government of Ghana, all UN system agencies, other development partners, representatives of civil society organizations and the private sector.

VII. Main preparation process: The preparation of the Assessment was managed by Ghana UN Country Team, under the leadership of The Resident Coordinator, with the government playing a leading role. The report was prepared by six thematic groups as indicated below:

<#0>idth1idth3idth2256idth3idth2477idth3idth3403 <#0>idth1idth3idth2256idth3idth2477idth3idth3403 <#0>idth1idth3idth2256idth3idth2477idth3idth3403 <#0>idth1idth3idth2256idth3idth2477idth3idth3403 <#0>idth1idth3idth2256idth3idth2477idth3idth3403 <#0>idth1idth3idth2256idth3idth2477idth3idth3403 <#0>idth1idth3idth2256idth3idth2477idth3idth3403 idth1idth3idth2256idth3idth2477idth3idth3403

CCA thematic work group

Government Lead Agency

Coordinating/Lead agencies

Food security and nutrition

Ministry of Food and Agriculture

FAO/WFP/UNU

Health

Ministry of Health

WHO/UNFPA/UNICEF

Water, sanitation and housing

Ministry of Works and Housing

World Bank/UNICEF/HABITAT/UNU

Education

Ministry of Education

UNICEF/UNESCO/WB

Income and employment

Ministry of Employment and Social Welfare

UNIDO/UNDP/FAO/WB

Protection and participation

Parliament/National Institutional Renewal Programme

UNDP/UNHCR

Macroeconomic framework

Ministry of Finance/NDPC

IMF/WB/UNDP

VIII. Linkages to Ghana-Vision 2020: By helping to engender common understanding and consensus of Ghana’s development needs across themes, sectors and donors, the CCA was to support the formulation of the Second Step of the Ghana Vision 2020.

VII. Key documents: Ghana – Common Country Assessment. United Nations, Joint Consultative Group on Policy. March 1997.

Ghana Common Country Assessment 1999. Accra. August 18, 2000

X. Observations on outcomes and effectiveness: The CCA has been effective in joint programming of UN development resources by the government and the UN system. The 1999 CCA was complementary to the CDF as it provided a cross-cutting assessment of human development, in contrast to the CDF process that was underpinned by sector and thematic group work. However, the CCA has not received publicity as a development-planning document and is not referred to outside the UN system. Consequently, it was not widely used in preparing the Second Step Policy Framework of Ghana Vision 2020 partly due to its low visibility and because its areas of thematic classification did not closely match those of the Second Step formulation.

3.2.6. Renewable Natural Resources Sector Strategy (1996-2000)

I. Year initiated: 1995, completed in 1996.

II. Brief description: An integrated strategic approach to the management of renewable natural resources (RNR) that ensures that various programmes aimed at enhancing the contribution of sustainable natural resource management to the accelerated social and economic development of Ghana are well-coordinated. This is to improve the efficiency, impact and sustainability of sector programmes. The strategy consists of a set of prioritized interventions that could be implemented within the current development environment and those that required significant reforms to overcome structural constraints in the sector.

III. Key Objectives: The overall objective is that RNR is sustainably managed for the benefit of present and future society. Specific aims are to:

  • establish effective institutional and legislative arrangements for the effective and efficient management of renewable natural resources
  • enhance regeneration of RNR, including biodiversity
  • increase the level of values-added to RNR products
  • make regulations in the RNR sector more enforceable
  • adopt appropriate technical options for resource utilization and management
  • reduce economic over-dependence on RNR

IV. Status of preparation and implementation: The preparation of the strategy was completed. However, implementation has not been effective.

V. Key stakeholders: Different stakeholders participated in the development of the strategy, but their scope could not make their involvement very participatory. A full presentation of stakeholder participation in the formulation of the RNRSS is presented in Section 5 of this report.

VI. Main preparation process: The government fashioned a process of consultations, consensus building and planning to ensure sustainable development of RNR through the Consultative Group on Renewable Natural Resources beginning with a Consensus Building workshop in September 1995. This was followed by a Goal Oriented Project Planning (GOPP) workshop in November 1995, a series of consultations, and, a Strategy Formulation workshop in March 1996 that resulted in the draft RNRSS. The draft Strategy was reviewed at a Stakeholder Forum in July 1996.

VII. Linkages to Ghana-Vision 2020: The strategy was developed in parallel to the First Medium Term Plan of the Ghana Vision 2020. However, the strategic framework for RNR management was in line with the First Step.

VIII. Key documents:

Government of the Republic of Ghana, National Development Planning Commission. Report on Goal Oriented Project Planning Workshop to Formulate a Strategic Programme for the Renewable Natural Resource Sector in Ghana. November 8-11, 1995.
Government of the Republic of Ghana, National Development Planning Commission. Workshop Report on Strategy Formulation for the Renewable Natural Resource Sector in Ghana. March 28, 1996.
Government of the Republic of Ghana, National Development Planning Commission. Report Stakeholder Forum on the Draft Renewable Natural Resources Strategy (1996-2000). September 12-13, 1996.
Participatory Approaches Learning Study of the Process of Formulating Renewable Natural Resources Sector in Ghana. Prepared by George Botchie, George Ortsin, F. D. Tay, G. Laryea-Adjei for International NGO Training and Research Centre (INTRAC), Oxford and UK Department for International Department under the supervision of NDPC, Accra.

IX. Observations on outcomes and effectiveness: It is not clear whether the government ever approved the RNRSS since the proposed institutional structure for managing the strategy, including the establishment of an inter-ministerial committee to issue policy guidelines and the expansion of the District Environmental Management Committees (DEMCs) to embrace other aspects of RNR management, was not set up. Furthermore, most of the projectized interventions in the sector during the period arose from sub-sectoral strategic plans, such as the National Biodiversity Strategy (1998), Forest and Wildlife Policy (1994), the Forestry Development Master Plan (1996-2000), and, the Forest Protection Strategy (1995). However, these initiatives and subsequent ones, such as the Environmental Sanitation Policy (May 1999) of the Ministry of Local Government and Rural Development, National Land Policy (June 1999) of the Ministry of Lands and Forestry, and the Strategic Plan (1999-2003) of the Environmental Protection Agency were in congruence with the objectives and components of the Renewable Natural Resources Sector Strategy.

3.2.7. National Economic Dialogue (NED)

I. Year initiated: May 2001

II. Brief description: The first national consensus building exercise for stakeholders to discuss the new government’s economic policies, including its approach to poverty alleviation within the context of its new vision for long term economic growth and the decision to participate in the HIPC programme. The Dialogue was attended by the President, Vice President, Ministers, donors and all types of stakeholders.

III. Key Objectives: The major objective was to reach consensus on the economic policies required to move Ghana forward from the present economic difficulties, including the large debt overhang and high inflation and unemployment.

IV. Status of preparation and implementation: Some outcomes of the NED are being factored into the new government’s economic policies, especially measures to regain fiscal balance, while the bulk of recommendations will inform future economic policies.

V. Key stakeholders: The interest groups that participated mirrored those that attended the 1997 National economic Forum.

VI. Main preparation process: Consultants prepared position papers to be discussed by Thematic Groups that set the agenda. An earlier workshop of thematic groups of stakeholders to discuss the new poverty reduction strategy in April provided a vital input into the preparations towards the NED. A further preparatory seminar was held for representatives of the stakeholder groups at the Ghana Institute of Management and Public Administration (GIMPA) prior to the main event. The NED was conducted around six themes: poverty reduction strategy; golden age of business; education, labour market and human resource development; resources for growth; economic policy; financial sector.

VII. Linkages to Ghana-Vision 2020: The new government explicitly rejected the Vision 2020 as the framework within which it will formulate its economic policies because it has evident that the goal of the Vision could not be achieved within the planned timeframe, given the major slippages in achieving targets under the First Plan 1995-2000. Hence, the new government has proclaimed its vision of Ghana developing into a major agro-industrial nation by 2015, propelled by a golden age of business. However, several of the thematic thrusts of the newly evolving economic policy framework cover the same ground as under the Vision 2000.

VIII. Key documents: Background papers by consultants.

IX. Observations on outcomes and effectiveness: The forum was well attended and the outcomes are very relevant to the nation’s progress. Most of the outcomes emphasized past recommendations or were variations on the major themes as there were few very significant ground-breaking recommendations. Nonetheless, vigorous and full implementation of the agreements reached by the stakeholders should place Ghana on the path to true sustainable growth and poverty reduction.

3.3 Identifying national strategies for sustainable development in Ghana

The DAC High Level Meeting in May 1999 defined a national strategy for sustainable development (NSSD) as “ a strategic and participatory process of analysis, debate, capacity strengthening, planning and action towards sustainable development”. The imperative is the integration of social and environmental concerns into economic development objectives.

However, the 2000-2001 OECD-DAC-developing country dialogues have engendered a modification of that definition as follows: “a coordinated set of participatory and continuously processes of analysis, debate, capacity-strengthening, planning and investment, which integrates the economic, social and environmental objectives of society, seeking trade-offs where this is not possible”.

Given the dynamics of development administration various development instruments seek to address diverse development imperatives. Hence, there are several strategies that seek to fulfill various development needs.

As a first step in identifying a national strategy for sustainable development in Ghana, it is essential to determine the extent to which various development administration processes meet conditions for sustainability and strategic orientation. This requires determining the parameters that make a planning process achieve sustainable development.

Consensus is only now emerging on the parameters of strategic frameworks for sustainable national development. The draft OECD/DAC Policy guidance for country-level strategies for sustainable development recognizes the following elements as necessary for a strategy process to achieve sustainable development:

(a) Goals and Principles: A coherent vision, commitment, policies and strategies to integrate economic, social and environmental objectives

(b) Mechanisms: The following set of mechanisms are required to implement the process of strategy development:

  • Intelligence gathering
  • Research and analysis
  • Strategic environmental, economic and social assessment
  • Participation
  • Communication
  • Experimentation and innovation
  • Planning and decision-making
  • Finance
  • Monitoring and accountability

Assessed against the above parameters, there are several areas of weaknesses of the Ghana Vision 2020. These include the following:

  • There is no overall and integrative model that integrates macroeconomic, sectoral, spatial/physical, and, financial aspects of planning.
  • It does not specify and agree on trade-offs in integrating the various pillars of the framework, such as environment, social and economic issues.
  • There was no scenario analysis to form the basis for strategy formulation and there has been no analysis of external linkages. Hence, the exercise is less than strategic.
  • The framework does not provide ways of dealing with constant change on the path to achieving the goals of the vision.
  • Long-term policy objective priorities are not necessarily reflected in public resource allocation and incentive structures.

Despite these defects, compared with the CDF, CCA, and the RNRS, the Vision 2020 meets most of the criteria above. The Vision framework:

  • is the most comprehensive development programming exercise;
  • is more of a strategic mechanism than most of the other;
  • defines the programmatic strategies required to achieve long-term goals;
  • takes the long-term view;
  • has provisions for strategic steps to achieve the vision (First Step, Second Step, etc);
  • has provisions for periodic review;
  • covers all the sectors needed to make a vision sustainable (economic, social, NRM, governance, gender, etc);
  • utilizes a participatory process of preparation.

In effect, the Vision 2020 is akin to an umbrella process that provides a broad vision of long term development goals, the big picture within which complementary strategies (such as GPRS and RNRS) can be identified as tools towards achieving the broad picture of the Vision, and the overall setting for the evolution of the institutional framework within which sector strategies and programmes are developed and integrated. It provided a guide for the way forward and to the various strategic approaches required to reach overall national development goals.

 


 


 


© NSSD 2003  
NSSD.net Home
Top of Page